SMU SIDRA Survey Report 2020

Section 8 International Commercial Litigation 61 At a Glance: 61 8.1 Choice of Litigation and Respondent User Satisfaction 61 Exhibit 8.1.1 Factors Influencing Choice of Litigation 61 Exhibit 8.1.2 Examination of Factors Influencing Choice of Litigation 62 Exhibit 8.1.3 Factors Influencing Choice of Litigation by Respondent User Profile 63 Exhibit 8.1.4 Satisfaction with Litigation Experience According to Factor 64 Exhibit 8.1.5 Examination of Satisfaction with Litigation Experience According to Factor 65 Exhibit 8.1.6 Satisfaction with Litigation Experience by Respondent User Profile 66 8.2 Choice of International Commercial Courts and Respondent User Satisfaction 67 Exhibit 8.2.1 Factors Influencing Choice of International Commercial Courts 67 Exhibit 8.2.2 Satisfaction with Choice of International Courts 67 Exhibit 8.2.3 Choice of International Commercial Courts 68 8.3 Litigation and Technology 69 Exhibit 8.3.1 Usefulness of Technology in Litigation 69 Exhibit 8.3.2 Usefulness of Technology in Litigation by Respondent User Profile 70 Section 9 Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 71 At a Glance: 71 9.1 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism in International Dispute Resolution 71 Exhibit 9.1.1 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism 71 Exhibit 9.1.2 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism by Respondent User Profile 72 9.2 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism Compared to Arbitration and Mediation 73 Exhibit 9.2.1 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism Compared to Arbitration 73 Exhibit 9.2.2 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism Compared to Arbitration by Respondent User Profile 74 Exhibit 9.2.3 Factors Influencing Choice of Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism Compared to Mediation 75 Exhibit 9.2.4 Factors Influencing Choice Hybrid Dispute Resolution Mechanism Compared to Mediation by Respondent User Profile 76 Acknowledgements 77 Author Team 77 Research Team 78 The Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy (SIDRA) 79 SIDRA INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION SURVEY v